Wilson v. Wilson
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Gross-appeals from Baltimore county court.- This was an attachment sued out by the appellant, upon a certain c-igreement referred to in the opinion of this court.
Read the full summary
Gross-appeals from Baltimore county court.- This was an attachment sued out by the appellant, upon a certain c-igreement referred to in the opinion of this court. The appellant made oath, before the justice who issued the warrant, “that Samuel M. Tinsley and John A. Keedy, merchants and co-partners trading under the name of $. M. Tinsley Co., are justly and bona fide indebted unto him, the said Greenbury B. Wilson, a merchant trading under the name of G. B. Wilson Co., in the just and full sutn of $900, over and above all discounts, for a deduction of 50 cents per barrel on eighteen hundred…
1Opinion of the Court
Spence, J'.,
delivered the opinion of this court.
This was a proceeding by way of attachment in Baltimore county court.
The record states the proceeding as follows :
Bo it remembered, that heretofore, to wit, on the twenty-first day of December, in the year of our Lord, one thousand eight hundred and forty-four, Thomas Hanson Belt, Esqr., one of the justices of the State of Maryland, in and for the city of Baltimore, pursuant to an act of the General Assembly of Maryland, in such case made and provided, sent to the clerk of Baltimore county court here a certain affidavit made before him, with an…
2Cited by25 opinions
- Hale Bros. v. MillikenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Dunn v. MackeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Blick v. Mercantile Trust & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
- Downs v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
- Eastover Co. v. All Metal Fabricators, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.