Legal Opinion

Blick v. Mercantile Trust & Deposit Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 5, 1910PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (Elliott, J.).

1Opinion of the CourtPearce, J.

On September 23rd, 1909, the appellant, Carroll B. Bliek, issued an attachment out of the Baltimore City Court against J ames M. Cochins, a non-resident of the State of Maryland, to recover the sum of $15,000 claimed to be due him for services rendered by him to said Cochins. This writ was laid in the hands of The Mercantile Trust and Deposit Company of Baltimore, The National Márine Bank, The Drovers and Mechanics’ National Bank, The Fidelity and Trust Company, and The Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, as garnishees. The defendant appeared specially in each of these cases for the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cowdin v. HuffIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Wilson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1849
  3. Bartlett v. WilburCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
  4. Steuart v. ChappellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
  5. Williams v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. GouldingMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Rounds v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Broward Builders Exchange, Inc. v. GoehringSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  4. Eisenberg, Admin. v. Air Cond., Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  5. Eastover Co. v. All Metal Fabricators, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API