State, Department of Social Services v. Vijil
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZIMMERMAN, Justice:
Daniel S. Vijil appeals from the denial of his motion to vacate the docketed award in the District Court for the Seventh Judicial District that served as the basis for the issuance of a writ of garnishment. The award was in favor of the Utah Department of Social Services (“DSS”) and was for amounts expended by the State of Utah to support Vijil’s minor children. Vijil claims that the district court erred in exercising subject matter and personal jurisdiction. We find that DSS did not meet its burden of showing that the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction over Vijil;…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Salt Lake City v. OhmsUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Jackson Const. Co., Inc. v. MarrsUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc. v. MelvinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
- D.A. v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Johnson v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.