Legal Opinion
Barker v. Scovill, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 3, 1983No. 82-1150PublishedCited by 164 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.
The sole issue presented in this case at bar is whether appellee, in allegedly discharging appellant from her employment, violated R.C. 4101.17 which, in essence, prohibits age-motivated hirings and firings.1 Finding the subject termination not to have been based on a violation of the statute, we affirm the appellate court’s decision.
The instant action is one wherein the controversy is over ends, not means. Neither party .disputes the fact that the analytical framework for determining the legality of appellee’s action has been properly set forth in Plumbers & Steamfitters Commt. v. Ohio Civil…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Plumbers & Steamfitters Joint Apprenticeship Committee v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Williams v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Edward ACKERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIAMOND SHAMROCK CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by164 opinions
- Edward E. ERCEGOVICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Vivian J. Scheid v. Fanny Farmer Candy Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Graham A. Peters v. The Lincoln Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Mauzy v. Kelly Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Ronald C. Majewski v. Automatic Data Processing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.