Legal Opinion
In Re Unisys Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits Erisa Litigation
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 20, 1995No. MDL 969PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CAHN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this action alleging that Unisys Corporation (“Unisys”) violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., when it unilaterally modified its retiree medical benefits plans. On October 26, 1994, the court approved a partial settlement (“the settlement”) as to Sperry and Burroughs incentive retirees (“the settlement class”). Attorneys for plaintiffs now petition the court for an award of fees and expenses.
I. BACKGROUND & PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The court will recite the background and procedural history of this case,…
2Cases cited97 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Karcich v. StuartDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- O'Keefe v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- In Re Safety Components, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Dehoyos v. Allstate Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2007
- In Re Xcel Energy, Inc., Securities, Derivative & "ERISA" LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.