Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hura v. Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1977No. 76-1136PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

The issue in the instant cause is whether Hura was entitled to a continuing contract for the 1974-1975 or 1975-1976 school years.

When a teacher becomes eligible for continuing service status under E. C. 3319.11, one of three things may occur with respect to his future employment status withiu the district.

In the first situation, he may be entitled to a continuing contract, as in the case where the board unqualifiedly re-employs him for the following year and thereafter; State, ex rel. Grandy, v. Bd. of Edn. (1971), 26 Ohio St. 2d 115.

In the second situation, he may be granted a limited…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. DeLong v. Board of Education of Southwest School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Justus v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State ex rel. Gandy v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State ex rel. Finn v. City of Garfield HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Anderson v. Hancock County Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Madden v. Windham Exempted Village School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State ex rel. Rollins v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Board of Edn. of Lordstown Local School District v. Ohio Civil Rights Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State ex rel. Lee v. Bellefontaine City Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State ex rel. Garay v. Hubbard Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API