Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Lee v. Bellefontaine City Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1985No. 84-1255PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford F. Brown, J.

The sole issue before the court involves the interpretation of R.C. 3319.11. Under R.C. 3319.11, a board of education may exercise one of three options when a teacher has met the conditions prerequisite for employment under a continuing contract. The board may (1) unqualifiedly re-employ the teacher under a continuing contract; (2) reemploy the teacher under a “limited contract” for no more than two years, provided certain statutory requirements are met; or (3) not renew the teacher’s contract, so long as written notice is given to the teacher by April 30. See State, ex rel. Hura, v. Bd. of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Hura v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Rollins v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Brennan v. Vinton County Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State ex rel. Luckey v. EtheridgeOhio Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API