Legal Opinion
Board of Edn. of Lordstown Local School District v. Ohio Civil Rights Comm.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 27, 1981No. 80-520PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDonofrio, J.
Appellant’s proposition of law No. 1 maintains that the claims are extinguished by the one-year statute of limitation, and that the amended statute of limitation cannot be applied retroactively to revive them.
Appellant’s proposition of law No. 2 states that the statute of limitation for filing a complaint begins to run on the date the teachers were served with written notice of nonrenewal and not on the date on which the contract expires or the teacher is terminated.. R. C. 4112.05(B), as it existed in 1975, required the ap-pellee commission to issue a complaint within one year after the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Judy C. EGELSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE AT GENESEO Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Jeannette M. GATES, Appellee, v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, a Corporation, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. LysyjOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- State ex rel. Teamsters Local Union 377 v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Children's Hospital v. Ohio Department of Public WelfareOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Turner v. IDS Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Oker v. Ameritech Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
- State Employment Relations Bd. v. Hubbard Township TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.