Legal Opinion

Kang v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 2, 2006No. 59, September Term, 2005PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.

We consider here whether it is fatal to a defendant knowingly and voluntarily waiving his right to a jury trial in a criminal proceeding, in the context of this record, for the trial judge not to include questions in the colloquy addressed specifically to the voluntariness of the defendant’s waiver. Also, we ponder whether the waiver was valid where there was no special, heightened inquiry on the record regarding the defendant’s understanding of the purported waiver where he used the services of a language interpreter. We consider also whether the defendant’s objection to the admissibility of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Abeokuto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Southern Management Corp. v. TahaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Linton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  3. State v. GoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. Hoile v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. DiazSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API