Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Diaz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 2006PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

TODD, J.:

¶ 1 Pedro Larrazabal Diaz appeals nunc pro tunc the order entered October 18, 2006 by the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his first petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”). 1 For the following reasons, we vacate and remand for an evidentiary hearing.

¶2 The relevant facts and procedural history of this matter, which originates from two separate criminal incidents, are as follows. At docket No. CC 200018094, Appellant was charged with possession, possession with intent to deliver, and delivery of a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. HickmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BedellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Com. v. Allison, K., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Com. v. Badell, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Com. v. Brady, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Com. v. Brennan, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API