Centric-Jones Co. v. Hufnagel
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey
The petitioners, Centric-Jones Company and its general partners, Nucon Construction Corporation and J.A. Jones Construction Company, have brought an original proceeding before this court pursuant to C.A.R. 21. For purposes of this opinion, we will refer to all three petitioners as Centric. Centric asks us to compel the respondent trial court to order the clerk to • enter judgment for it pursuant to its acceptance of an offer of judgment under section 13-17-202(3), 6A C.R.S. (1992 Supp.). Of concern in this case is whether the trial court was correct in finding that an entry of summary…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- T. M. Cobb Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Halaby, McCrea & Cross v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Greenwood v. StevensonDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1980
- People v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Sonnenburg v. GrohskopfCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Scholz v. Metropolitan Pathologists, P.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- James Perkins v. U S West CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- People v. BlandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Garcia v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Ferrellgas, Inc. v. YeiserSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.