James Perkins v. U S West Communications
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOWMAN,. Circuit Judge.
U S West Communications, Inc., appeals from the amended judgment entered by the District .Court 2 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) in favor of James Perkins based on U S West’s Federal Rule of CM Procedure 68 offer of judgment. We affirm.
On November 19, 1996, U S West moved for summary judgment in this Title VII sex discrimination case. ■ On March 18, 1997, while the summary judgment motion was pending and in the absence of a trial date, U S West made a Rule 68 offer of judgment. 3 Two days-later, on March 20, 1997, the District Court, having no…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Colonial Penn Insurance Company v. Willard Frank Coil Betty Marian CoilCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mallory v. EyrichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Chuck Lee Mathenia v. Paul DeloCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Mei Xing Yu v. Hasaki Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Computrol, Inc., - Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Newtrend, L.P. And Ca Newtrend, Inc., - AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Barger v. Hayes County Non-Stock Co-Op (In Re Barger)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Innovative Home Health Care, Inc. v. P.T.-O.T. Associates of the Black HillsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Jake Pittari v. American Eagle Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.