Legal Opinion

Puente v. Spanish Nat. State

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 6, 1940No. 129PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff has sued the “Spanish National State, as a Juristic Person,” for professional services rendered and makes affidavit that he caused service of the summons and a copy of the complaint to be made “on Miguel Espinoso, who, your deponent states upon information and belief, is the managing agent of said defendant.” No appearance was entered for defendant, but the clerk of the district court received an “alleged letter” (as the plaintiff puts it) “respectfully submitted” over the signature of the Ambassador to the Spanish Government in the United States, wherein the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kawananakoa v. PolyblankSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Porto Rico v. Rosaly Y CastilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Compania Espanola De Navegacion Maritima, SA v. the NavemarSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen v. Dexter & Carpenter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  5. Banco De Espana v. Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. De Letelier v. Republic of ChileDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980
  4. Republic of China v. American Express Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  5. In re Investigation of World Arrangements with Relation to the Production, Transportation, Refining & Distribution of PetroleumDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1952

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API