Legal Opinion

Porto Rico v. Rosaly Y Castillo

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 24, 1913No. 145PublishedCited by 170 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PORTO RICO. The facts, which involve the construction of § 7 of the Organic Act of Porto Rico and whether the Government of that Island can be sued without its consent, are stated in the opinion.

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PORTO RICO. The facts, which involve the construction of § 7 of the Organic Act of Porto Rico and whether the Government of that Island can be sued without its consent, are stated in the opinion. Although this is an action at law, as it was not tried by jury it is rightly brought here by appeal, according to the provisions of § 35 of the act of April 12, 1900, 31 Stat. 85, and § 2 of the act of April 7,1874,18 Stat. 27. Garzot v. de Rubio, 209 U. S. 283; Murphy v. Ramsey, 114 U. S. 15, 35. The body politic known as The People of Porto Rico, by virtue of the…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice White

The appellee was plaintiff in the first instance. The defendants were The People of Porto Rico (the Govern-, ment of the Island) and several named individuals. Recovery was sought of property in possession of the defendants and for rents and profits. The individual defendants defaulted. The Government defended and from a judgment ousting it from the property and for rents and profits appealed to the Supreme Court. The court, giving its reasons for affirmance, thus stated the only issue presented and which was decided: “The appeal was taken by The Peoplé of Porto Rico, and the only ground…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kawananakoa v. PolyblankSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Gordon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  3. La Abra Silver Mining Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Gromer v. Standard Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. New York Ex Rel. Kopel v. BinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by170 opinions

  1. Tooke v. City of MexiaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Puerto Rico v. Shell Co. (PR), Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Secretary of Agriculture v. Central Roig Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Defendini Collazo v. Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1993

165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API