Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 3, 2010No. 08-17756PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge B. FLETCHER; Dissent by Judge N.R. SMITH.

OPINION

B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs obtained a default judgment against Iran for $2,656,944,877. When it became clear that Iran was not going to comply with the judgment, plaintiffs moved the district court to order Iran to assign to the plaintiffs, as judgment creditors, Iran’s rights to payment from CMA CGM. CMA CGM is a French shipping company that allegedly frequents Iranian ports and pays Iran for use of its harbors and for providing its ships with bunkering oil. The district court raised the issue of foreign sovereign…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Verlinden B. v. v. Central Bank of NigeriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Walters v. INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINACourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. James Owens v. Republic of SudanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  3. Global Technology, Inc. v. Yubei (Xinxiang) Power Steering System Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  4. Keith Stansell v. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Columbia, (FARC)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  5. Angellino v. Royal Family Al-SaudCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API