Legal Opinion

Van Der Veken v. Joffrion

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 13, 1987No. 9562PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Olin Joffrion took a post-answer default judgment against Laurent H. Van Der Veken based upon two promissory notes. Van Der Veken appeals that judgment.

Van Der Veken brings two points of error contending: (1) that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant a motion for new trial, and (2) that there is insufficient evidence to support the judgment.

The trial court found Van Der Veken liable to Joffrion on two promissory notes in the amounts of $3,500 and $3,075. The ' suit was filed on August 4, 1986, and the petition alleges that Van Der Veken executed and delivered to Joffrion…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Cliff v. HugginsTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Ivy v. CarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Strackbein v. PrewittTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Ward v. NavaTexas Supreme Court · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cecil v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Womack-Humphreys Architects, Inc. v. Barrasso, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
  3. Thermex Energy Corp. v. Rantec Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  4. Wiseman v. Levinthal, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  5. State & County Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API