Legal Opinion

Wiseman v. Levinthal

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided December 19, 1991No. 01-91-00334-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’CONNOR, Justice.

The only issue here is whether the defendant satisfied the requirements for setting aside the judgment. The trial court granted Robert Levinthal, M.D., the plaintiff, a post-answer default judgment against J.W. Wiseman, the defendant, when Wiseman failed to appear at trial. We find that the defendant did not satisfy the requirements for setting aside the judgment and we affirm.

This is an appeal, voluntarily accelerated by the parties, in which they agree to: Submit briefs on an accelerated schedule (appellant files his brief 20 days from the filing of the record,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Stoner v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Cliff v. HugginsTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Ivy v. CarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Strackbein v. PrewittTexas Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Bowers, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
  2. Lively v. Libbey Memorial Physical Medicine Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Carstar Collision, Inc. v. Mercury Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Mahand v. Delaney, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
  5. Southwest Warren, Inc. and Thomas Eugene McCain v. Theresa CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API