Paulson v. Paulson
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George K. Cracraft, Judge.
Virgil Eugene Paulson appeals from that part of a separate maintenance decree which awards Lula Beth Paulson attorney’s fees. He contends that the court had no authority to allow attorney’s fees against him pursuant to a separate maintenance decree and that the fees allowed were excessive. Appellee cross appeals contending that the award of separate maintenance was inadequate and that the chancellor erred in failing to let her make adequate discovery of appellant’s assets. We find no merit in either the appeal or the cross appeal.
The voluminous record consists of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lytle v. LytleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Robinson v. ChampionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Waller v. WallerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Finkbeiner v. FinkbeinerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Aucoin v. AucoinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McKay v. McKaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Davis v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Gilliam v. GilliamCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
- Speer v. SpeerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
- Tiner v. TinerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.