Legal Opinion
Davis v. Williamson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided September 30, 2004No. 03-682PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jim Hannah, Justice.
Teresa Ann Davis appeals a decision of the Circuit Court her motion for attorney’s fees. We find no abuse of discretion and affirm. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 1-2(a)(7) (2004), a subsequent appeal following an appeal decided in the Supreme Court. Davis v. Williamson, 353 Ark. 225, 114 S.W.3d 216 (2003).
Facts
On July 31, 1996, a joint petition to establish paternity was filed. The petition sought a finding and order of paternity as well as an order on custody and child support. Paternity was not contested, and on April 27, 1998, an order establishing…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chrisco v. Sun Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Barnes v. EverettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Burns v. BurnsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Cotten v. FooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Harris v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Alexander v. McEwenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Artman v. HoySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Ryan & Co. AR, Inc. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Centerpoint Energy, Inc. v. MILLER COUNTY CIRCUIT SECOND DIV.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.