Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Police Officers Federation v. City of Minneapolis

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 21, 1992No. C1-92-126, C3-92-354PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

This is a consolidated appeal in a dispute between the City of Minneapolis and the Minneapolis Police Officers Federation over legal representation for a police officer who is both a defendant in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action and the subject of a police disciplinary action. We reverse the trial court's declaration that the city attorney's conflict of interest requires separate representation in the section 1983 action, affirm the judgment denying attorney’s fees for bringing the declaratory action, and deny attorney’s fees on appeal.

FACTS

William Chaplin is a police sergeant…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Morrison v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Environmental Protection Agency v. Pollution Control BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Dunton v. County of SuffolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. Lanoue v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miller v. AlagnaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000
  2. State v. ThurmondCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API