Minneapolis Police Officers Federation v. City of Minneapolis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
This is a consolidated appeal in a dispute between the City of Minneapolis and the Minneapolis Police Officers Federation over legal representation for a police officer who is both a defendant in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action and the subject of a police disciplinary action. We reverse the trial court's declaration that the city attorney's conflict of interest requires separate representation in the section 1983 action, affirm the judgment denying attorney’s fees for bringing the declaratory action, and deny attorney’s fees on appeal.
FACTS
William Chaplin is a police sergeant…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Morrison v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Environmental Protection Agency v. Pollution Control BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Dunton v. County of SuffolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Lanoue v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miller v. AlagnaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000
- State v. ThurmondCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004