Legal Opinion

State v. Romanosky

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1993No. CR-90-0105-APPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOELLER, Vice Chief Justice.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

At trial, the state’s theory was that defendant and two accomplices robbed the victim and his wife in their Phoenix motel room. During the course of the robbery, the victim was shot and killed. At his first trial, defendant was convicted of first degree murder, armed robbery, and aggravat*119ed assault. Because of evidentiary errors, we reversed and remanded for a new trial. State v. Romanosky, 162 Ariz. 217, 782 P.2d 693 (1989). The evidence is summarized in the earlier opinion and need not be restated here. At his second trial, the trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. State v. GendronArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. BracyArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. PedersonArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. RomanoskyArizona Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  3. State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. United States v. StarksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  5. State v. PrestonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API