Legal Opinion

State v. Sullivan

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 29, 2003No. 1 CA-CR 02-0115PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARKER, Judge.

¶ 1 We determine in this case that the failure to give a reasonable doubt instruction in the manner prescribed in State v. Portillo, 182 Ariz. 592, 898 P.2d 970 (1995), is error but that it is not structural error and remains subject to a harmless error analysis.

Background

¶ 2 Appellant Michael Sullivan was charged with and convicted on one count of forgery, a class 4 felony. On August 2, 2001, appellant presented a check in the amount of $895 to a teller at the Bank of America located at 35th Avenue and Peoria. The check identified appellant as the payee and he presented…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. PortilloArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. LandriganArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Christy C. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. State v. BejaranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. State v. NewnomCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. State of Arizona v. Andy Daniel AlmeidaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  5. State of Arizona v. Ramon Escareno MerazCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API