Legal Opinion
State v. Preston
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 14, 2000No. 2 CA-CR 98-0524PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLÓREZ, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellant Sean Edward Preston was charged with four counts of sale of methamphetamine to an undercover Tucson police officer. A jury returned verdict forms on which they had written the word “guilty” in the blank space for each of the four counts. The trial court sentenced appellant to concurrent, three-year prison terms on three of the counts and a seven-year term of probation on the other. He appeals, raising several related challenges to the constitutionality of Arizona’s entrapment statute, A.R.S. § 13-206.
¶ 2 At his trial, Preston raised the defense of…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. CaseyArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. FarleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- State v. SeyrafiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- State of Arizona v. Craig A. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- State v. JeffreyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.