Commonwealth v. Burno
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice STEVENS.1
The Commonwealth appeals from the trial court’s September 30, 2009 order granting Junius Burno a new trial based on his trial counsel’s alleged ineffective representation in failing to object to remarks made by the prosecutor during her closing argument to the jury. Burno has filed a cross-appeal claiming the trial court erred in refusing to grant him relief on numerous remaining issues, which he raised in his post-sentence motions. We reverse the trial court’s September 30, 2009 order granting Burno’s motion for a new trial, remand for the resolution of any pending…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. Woodard, A., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. Burno, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.