Legal Opinion

Haught v. Continental Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 27, 1943No. 30277PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.

This action was instituted in the superior court of Seminole county on August 3, 1939, by Dan Haught and Hazel Haught, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, against the Continental Oil Company, hereinafter referred to as defendant, wherein plaintiffs sought recovery of damages to real property owned by them. It was alleged that defendant, in conducting operations for oil and gas upon the land, had neglected to bury certain pipe lines and other obstructions upon the surface of the land, which had resulted in damage to the real property, and that defendant had also permitted oil, salt water,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Doyle v. WadeSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
  2. Hughes v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Meshek v. CordesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Black v. DonelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Stinchcomb v. PattesonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. White v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. C & C Tile Co. v. Independent Sch. Dist. No. 7 of Tulsa Cty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  3. Wilt v. SmackDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Wiley Electric, Inc. v. BrantleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. Travelers Insurance Company v. LeedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API