Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Coots

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 17, 1988No. 87-520PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The sole issue presented by this petition for writ of mandamus is whether the trial court abused the discretion permitted in discovery matters in prohibiting the plaintiffs from using the deposition of a licensed physician expert as substantive evidence in the trial of the case.

The action underlying this petition is a medical malpractice action in which the plaintiffs allege that the defendants negligently treated Sheila Coots, who died after the suit was filed. Her personal representative was subsequently substituted as a party plaintiff. During the discovery period, Dr. Robert K. Sangster,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dale J. Savoie v. Lafourche Boat Rentals, Inc. v. Loffland Brothers CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  3. Rosenthal v. Peoples Cab Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Joan B. Gill and Neil H. Gill v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, and Third-Party v. Danny Eugene Helms, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stoczynski v. LivermoreColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Ex Parte HattonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Masterbrand Cabinets, Inc. v. GilmoreCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API