Legal Opinion
Sakis v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 21, 1952No. 763-51PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAMM, District Judge.
Factual Background.
This is an action invoking the functions of a statutory three-judge court under Section 2321 of Title 28 of the United States Code to enjoin, suspend, set aside and annul an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission (hereafter called the Commission). The plaintiffs ask also that the Court declare Section 20b of Title 49 of the United States Code Annotated (known as the Ma-haffie Act) unconstitutional. The order challenged in this action had its genesis in a proceeding before the Commission entitled Finance Docket No. 16250. The order authorized the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of New York v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1972
- Breswick & Co. v. BriggsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Public Service Commission v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1956
- Wood v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955