Legal Opinion
Breswick & Co. v. Briggs
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 6, 1955PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALSH, District Judge.
Upon the claim that Alleghany Corporation is an investment company subject to regulation by the Securities and Exchange Commission, rather than a carrier subject to regulation by the Interstate Commerce Commission, plaintiffs, minority stockholders of Alleghany, seek to enjoin it from conducting certain proceedings before the I.C.C. and to prevent the issue and exchange of certain securities for which S.E.C. approval would be required if this claim of the plaintiffs is correct. Plaintiffs’ application for a temporary injunction is denied, and they are left to the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Florida v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- New York Central Securities Corporation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hoover v. AllenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Breswick & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Schwartz v. BowmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Breswick & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Simmons v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.