Ward v. Tinkham
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Eaton. (Hooker, J.) Appeal from settlement of final account of administrator, who brings error. The facts are stated in the ojfinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChakplin, J.
Tinkham was administrator of the estate *697of Caleb Hutton, deceased. The assets which came to his hands amounted to $32,000 or thereabouts, being all personal property, with the exception of real estate valued at $2,540. Commissioners on claims were appointed, who heard claims against the estate, and filed their report August 7, 1882. The total amount of claims proved against the estate was about $650. Caleb Hutton died in August, A. D. 18S1, leaving Martha Hutton, his widow, and Inez Hutton, an infant and adopted child, him surviving, as sole heirs at law and distributees.
Tinkham was appointed…
2Cited by21 opinions
- In Re Jennings' EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1925
- Ring v. LundSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Brooks v. HargraveMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Mathews v. SheehanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Swaine v. HemphillMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.