Legal Opinion

Charolais Breeding Ranches, Ltd. v. Wiegel

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1979No. 77-158PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

We deem it necessary to set forth the facts in considerable detail because they are somewhat unusual and the issues relate to whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion of Charoláis Breeding Ranches, Ltd. (hereinafter CBR), to reopen or vacate the judgment.

On April 80, 1974, CBR commenced an action against Wiegel seeking a declaratory judgment adjudging that CBR was entitled to the immediate possession of some 276 head of Charoláis cattle owned by CBR and in the possession of Wiegel under a “CATTLE CARE CONTRACT,” and damages for the wrongful detention of the cattle.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dugenske v. DugenskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Hansher v. KaishianWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Bank of Commerce v. ElliottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Paschong v. HollenbeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Giese v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Johnson v. Allis Chalmers Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Garfoot v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  4. Industrial Roofing Services, Inc. v. MarquardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  5. J.L. Phillips & Associates, Inc. v. E&H Plastic Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API