Boone v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION
Cline, Judge:
I regret that I am unable to agree that the merchandise involved therein consists of screenings and nothing more.
The merchandise was invoiced and entered as “barley bran” and was assessed ■with duty at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as an unenumerated manufactured article. It is claimed to be properly •dutiable at 5 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 731, as modified by the •trade agreement with Canada, T. D. 49752, or at 7}{ per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1555, as modified by said trade agreement.
It appears…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- James Richardson & Sons, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
- Consolidated Elevator Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- Williamson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- Boone v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947