Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Koury

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1997No. 96-2427PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Under Gov.Bar R. V(8)(E), an attorney must inform existing clients of his suspension, notify them to seek legal services elsewhere, notify opposing counsel of the suspension, and file a notice of disqualification with any court where he has litigation pending. These duties were specifically set forth in our order of December 10, 1993. That order also provided that “respondent [shall] immediately cease and desist from the practice of law in any form” and *436that “on or before January 10,1994, respondent [shall] surrender his certificate of admission to practice to the Clerk of this court and that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Akron Bar Ass'n v. ThorpeOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. ShabazzOhio Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BancsiOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. ElsassOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. AllisonOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. KouryOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MbakpuoOhio Supreme Court · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API