Legal Opinion

Barron v. State Ex Rel. Eyman

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 5, 1968No. 2 CA-CIV 493PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLOY, Judge.

The appellants filed a joint petition for a writ of habeas corpus in Pinal County Superior Court. The State responded and alleged that the petitioners had raised no issues for which habeas corpus was the proper remedy, it being limited to test the jurisdiction of the trial court. The lower court denied the petition without a hearing and this appeal followed.

The gravamen of appellants’ petition is denial of “effective assistance of counsel.” The appellants and two others were jointly charged with robbery. One attorney was appointed to represent all four defendants and the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State v. KruchtenArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. United States Ex Rel. Feeley v. RagenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
  5. Lowell Lyons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PietschArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. StreettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  3. State v. CufioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. Trevino v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API