State v. Streett
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
KRUCKER, Chief Judge.
Because of the identity of questions presented in these three appeals, this court, upon the defendant’s motion, ordered consolidation for all purposes. In fact, Nos. 2 CA-CR 185 and 186 were consolidated for trial below, resulting in convictions for both offenses charged: (1) obtaining money by false pretenses or confidence game, and (2) theft by embezzlement. In a separate trial, defendant was found guilty of the crime of forgery. All three charges arose out of the defendant’s conduct while •employed as an automobile salesman for Pueblo Ford, a Tucson, Arizona car dealer.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. LeonArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. KruchtenArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. HessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- United States v. BirrellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. BeatyArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. VickersArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. RoseArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. KevilArizona Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. PietschArizona Supreme Court · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.