Legal Opinion
United States v. Felix Rendon Osuna
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 22, 1998No. 98-5005PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This direct criminal appeal is before the court on appellant Felix Rendon Osuna’s Motion to Dismiss, which was filed in response to the district court’s denial of appellant’s Application for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs (“Application”). We deny appellant’s motion to dismiss without prejudice, vacate the district court’s order denying the Application, and remand this appeal to the district court for the limited purpose of reconsideration of the Application in light of this order.
Background
Mr. Osuna was represented by retained counsel at trial. Subsequent to Sling…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Christopher SimmondsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Schlicher v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Maria Asuncion Martinez De Hernandez, Baldomero Hernandez-Gonzales, Carmen Perea, Carlos Perea, Salvador Pineda-VergaraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Lester Gene Boutwell, and United States of America v. Morris Allen PritchettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Bullion, James D.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Marcus DurhamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Edmond Leon LeopardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Kosic (Nunez)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- United States v. LeopardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.