Legal Opinion

United States v. Edmond Leon Leopard

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 16, 1999No. 98-7013PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter is before the court on defendant’s application for a certificate of appeala-bility (COA). Defendant seeks to appeal from an order denying his motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. For procedural reasons explained below, we grant COA, vacate the order denying the § 2255 motion, and remand the case with directions to appoint counsel and conduct further proceedings. 1 We do not, however, express any opinion on the ultimate disposition of the substantive grounds raised in the motion.

This court’s opinion on defendant’s direct appeal sets out the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. Kenneth Wayne HollandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chambers v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. Simpson v. MatesanzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  3. Easterwood v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. Batrez Gradiz v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. Leopard v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API