Legal Opinion

United States v. Maria Asuncion Martinez De Hernandez, Baldomero Hernandez-Gonzales, Carmen Perea, Carlos Perea, Salvador Pineda-Vergara

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 28, 1984No. 83-1008, 83-1009, 83-1062, 83-1063 and 83-1074PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SETH, Chief Judge.

This is a consolidated appeal taken by five defendants from their convictions on various charges relating to the unlawful transportation of illegal aliens. 8 U.S.C. § 1324; 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 371.

The Government established at trial that numerous Mexican and El Salvadoran citizens who wished to enter the United States contacted the defendant Pineda-Vergara. Pineda-Vergara owned a sort of rooming house at Ciudad Juarez to which the persons would come. Apparently he would then arrange for them to cross the Rio Grande and illegally enter the United States through the city of El…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. Lupe GomezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Larry M. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Marquez v. Albuquerque, City ofCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Mark CarterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API