Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Brinker
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided March 19, 1993No. Cause No. IP 91-471-CPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY AND ORDER ON THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION’S MOTIONS TO QUASH OR MODIFY THE PLAINTIFF’S SUBPOENAE
FOSTER, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the non-party Indiana Department of Correction’s motion to quash or modify two subpoe-nae duces tecum duly served on it by the United States Marshals Service on behalf of *193the plaintiff.1 In this section 1983 suit, the plaintiff complains that certain employees of the Department of Correction assigned to the Wishard Hospital Detention Ward (“Ward”) violated his Fourteenth Amendment rights during two treatment visits…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Walker v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Henry W. Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, John Van Geldern, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Graham v. Casey's General StoresDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2002
- Keplinger v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
- Noble Roman's, Inc. v. Hattenhauer Distributing Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2016
- Stout v. Illinois Farmers InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1993
- Golitko v. Indiana Department of CorrectionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.