Legal Opinion
Graham v. Casey's General Stores
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided March 18, 2002No. IP01-1310-C-K/HPublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS
BAKER, United States Magistrate Judge.
In a hotly debated issue among labor and employment lawyers in this district and beyond, the Court addresses the sufficiency of non-party requests for production of documents to a plaintiffs former and current employers in an employment discrimination ease. Plaintiff claims such requests lack relevancy and are utilized as a tool to invade privacy. Defendant states they are a useful tool to craft its defenses. Both positions have some merit. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs motion to quash subpoenas…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Dale Gehring v. Case CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Kim GASTINEAU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FLEET MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Maddow v. Procter & Gamble Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Simon Property Group L.P. v. mySimon, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2006
- McGrath v. EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2008
- Milinazzo v. State Farm InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
- Cunningham v. Smithkline BeechamDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. NokesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.