Legal Opinion

Abundis v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 9, 1989No. 22-88CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

Pending before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability. After oral argument, the court directed the parties to narrow the fact issues by resubmitting proposed findings of fact. Additional briefing was also allowed. After considering the parties’ submissions and argument, the motion is denied.

I. BACKGROUND

Ruben S. Abundis and over 500 others who have filed their written consent to be party plaintiffs in accordance with 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) (1982), are, or were, employed by the United States Government in engineering,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Abbott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  2. Ackerman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  3. Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  4. Beall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  5. King v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API