Legal Opinion

Tromanhauser v. Grisemer

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1932No. Docket No. 395PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSON, J., pro tem.

This is an action for damages. The first four causes of action are for damages for slander and the fifth cause of action is for damages for false imprisonment. The case came on for trial before a jury December 18, 1930. After plaintiff had rested on the first four causes of action, defendant made a motion for a nonsuit as to each of the causes of action in said complaint, and the motion was granted as to the first, second, third and fourth causes of action and denied as to the fifth cause. By stipulation of the parties the jury was then discharged and the trial proceeded…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown v. Sterling Furniture Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Marks v. KeenanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Henry v. LingsweilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Finch v. EkstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Lewis v. Hammond Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. McColgan v. Jones, Hubbard & Donnell, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Scrimsher v. Reliance Rock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Nulsen v. NulsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Nicholson v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API