Legal Opinion
Hannigan v. City of Concord
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 21, 1999No. 97-666PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, J.
The plaintiffs, Thomas and Mary Hannigan and Russell Matthews, appeal an order of the Superior Court (Smukler, J.) affirming the decisions of the Concord Planning Board (planning board) and Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) allowing the intervenor, Concord Country Club (club), to construct a golf course maintenance building and access way in residential districts abutting the plaintiffs’ properties. On appeal, the plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred by: (1) ruling that a proposed maintenance building was a permitted accessory use; (2) affirming the grant of a special exception to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- In re GrimmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Metzger v. Town of BrentwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Merrill v. Great Bay Disposal Service, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- State v. PT & L. Construction Company, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fox v. Town of GreenlandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Triangle Fraternity v. City of Norman, Ex Rel. Norman Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Town of Salem v. WicksonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Marchand v. Town of HudsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Bayson Properties, Inc. v. City of LebanonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.