State v. PT & L. Construction Company, Inc.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Conford, P. J. A. D.

(temporarily assigned). This appeal is before the Court on direct certification to the Superior Court, Law Division, 1 75 N. J. 584 (1977). The primary question for determination is whether use of vacant land as a helistop should be deemed a valid accessory use to property occupied as the headquarters of a construction company and used also for storage of its heavy equipment, within the meaning of a zoning ordinance permitting accessory uses “if customarily incident to a permitted use.” Aside from the matter of the helistop use, the…