Legal Opinion

Marchand v. Town of Hudson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 31, 2001No. 2000-131PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C. J.

The defendant, the Town of Hudson (town), appeals from a Superior Court (Brennan, J.) order rescinding a building permit granted to the intervenor, Jeremy L. Muller. The town argues that the court misapplied the law on accessory uses and ordered relief that conflicted with federal objectives to allow and promote amateur ham radio facilities. We affirm in part, reverse in part, vacate and remand.

Muller resides in a section of Hudson zoned Residential-Two (R-2), and is an amateur or “ham” radio operator. In December 1998, when Muller applied for a building permit, the town had no regulations…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Knoxville v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Vernon Howard, Cross-Appellant v. City of Burlingame, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Britton v. Town of ChesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  4. Sylvia Pentel v. City of Mendota HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. Becker v. Town of Hampton FallsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Community Resources for Justice, Inc. v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  2. Smith v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Stephen E. Forster d/b/a Forster's Christmas Tree Farm & Gift Shoppe v. Town of HennikerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
  4. Smith v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Menefee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API