Legal Opinion
Krauth v. Executive Telecard, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 13, 1994No. 94 Civ. 7337 (RWS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Walter K. Krauth, Jr. (“Krauth”), William Miller (“Miller”) and David E. Legere (“Legere”) (collectively, the “Committee”) move: (1) to dismiss the amended counterclaim and third party complaint; (2) to hold the Defendant in contempt; (3) for sanctions against Defendant and its attorneys; and (4) to compel discovery. Plaintiff Theodore J. Mayer (“Mayer”) moves to dismiss the amended counterclaims and third-party claims and to stay discovery which is predicated on these claims.
Plaintiffs’ motions are granted in part and denied in part, as discussed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- New York State National Organization for Women v. TerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Studebaker Corporation v. Richard D. GittlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Knipe v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Rodick v. City of SchenectadyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schweizer v. MulvehillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Krauth v. Executive Telecard, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Capital Real Estate Investors Tax Exempt Fund Ltd. Partnership v. SchwartzbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Holmes v. NBC/GEDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Krauth v. Executive Telecard, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.