Legal Opinion
Krauth v. Executive Telecard, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 31, 1995No. 95 Civ. 3491 (RWS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The Defendant Executive Telecard, Ltd. (“EXTL” or the “Coiporation”) has moved to dismiss this action for lack of jurisdiction due to a lack of complete diversity between the parties. For the reasons discussed herein, the Defendant’s motion is granted.
Parties
Plaintiff Walter K. Krauth, Jr. (“Krauth”) is a resident of Jonesboro, Georgia. He and William Miller (“Miller”), a resident of Bay-side, New York, and David E. Legere (“Leg-ere”), a resident of Williamsburg, Virginia, formed the EXTL Shareholders Protective Committee, (the “Committee”), in September 1994 for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- R. G. Barry Corporation v. Mushroom Makers, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Scot Typewriter Co. v. Underwood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Inland Rubber Corporation v. Triple a Tire Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Eisenberg v. New England Motor Freight, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Frisone v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Augienello v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Krauth v. Executive Telecard, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- SEG Vanguard General Corp. v. Jianxiong JiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002