Legal Opinion

Daido Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided November 10, 1994No. Consolidated Court No. 93-06-00311PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Carman, Judge:

Plaintiffs contest the Department of Commerce’s (Commerce) Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Daido Corp. v. United States (June 27, 1994) (Remand Results). Plaintiffs request the Court to remand the action to Commerce and claim that Commerce’s Remand Results are not supported by substantial evidence. This Court retained jurisdiction over this matter during the pendency of Commerce’s remand investigation.

Background

Daido Kogyo Co., Ltd., and Enuma Chain Manufacturing Co., Ltd. are Japanese manufacturers of roller chain. Daido Corporation is an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  4. Neuweg Fertigung GmbH v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
  5. Borlem S.A.-Empreedimentos Industriais v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Daido Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  2. Humane Society of the United States v. ClintonUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
  3. Skf USA Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API