People v. Holland
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, the motion to suppress granted, and a new trial ordered.
On the present record, it cannot be said that the People carried their heavy burden of proving defendant’s statements voluntary beyond a reasonable doubt (see, e.g., People v Anderson, 42 NY2d 35, 38-39). Initially, the prosecution wholly failed to justify defendant’s lengthy prearraignment incarceration, which spanned a period of some 48 hours and encompassed portions of three different days. While the People now assert that no Judge was available for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. BlakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
3Cited by55 opinions
- People v. HopkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- The People v. Jin Cheng LinNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. CrosbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. WilhelmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.