Legal Opinion

People v. Holland

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1979PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, the motion to suppress granted, and a new trial ordered.

On the present record, it cannot be said that the People carried their heavy burden of proving defendant’s statements voluntary beyond a reasonable doubt (see, e.g., People v Anderson, 42 NY2d 35, 38-39). Initially, the prosecution wholly failed to justify defendant’s lengthy prearraignment incarceration, which spanned a period of some 48 hours and encompassed portions of three different days. While the People now assert that no Judge was available for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. People v. BlakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. People v. HopkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. The People v. Jin Cheng LinNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. People v. CrosbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. People v. WilhelmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API