Legal Opinion

People v. Blake

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 1974PublishedCited by 206 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge Breitel.

Defendant appeals from convictions for criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree (Penal Law, § 165.50) and unauthorized use of a vehicle (Penal Law, § 165.05), after a jury trial. He was sentenced to probation on the stolen property charge and to a conditional discharge on the vehicle use charge.

The issue is whether identifications made by witnesses at prearraignment corporeal viewings of defendant absent counsel should be excluded.

The order of the Appellate Division affirming the convictions should be affirmed. Counsel at prearraignment viewings is not…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by206 opinions

  1. People v. ChippNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. HicksNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. SettlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Murphy v. LynnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  5. People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

201 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API