Legal Opinion
Daniel Ray Willis v. Raymond W. Meier, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 7, 1970No. 25345PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant, a federal prisoner, contends that 18 U.S.C.A. § 4205, which provides that prisoners who violate their paroles serve the unexpired terms of their sentences without credit for the time on parole, subjects such prisoners to double punishment in violation of the guarantee against double jeopardy of the Fifth Amendment. Appellant is such a prisoner. The District Court ordered his petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. We affirm.
18 U.S.C. § 4205 reads as follows:
“A warrant for the retaking of any United States prisoner who has violated his parole, may be issued only by the Board…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Anderson v. CorallSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Zerbst v. KidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Odis R. Van Buskirk v. Fred T. Wilkinson, as Warden of the United States Penitentiary, McNeil Island, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Duane Douglas LominacCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- Morden v. United States Board of ParoleDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1974
- Harris v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1971
- United States v. Duane Douglas LominacCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998